“Almost closed” deals often feel closer than they are. This happens because we interpret activity and positivity as real progress.
“We’re almost there.”
It sounds familiar.
The tone is positive. The meetings are happening. Everything feels aligned.
"The tone is positive. The meetings are happening. Everything feels aligned."
And yet, weeks later, nothing has changed.
We do not misjudge deals because we lack experience.
We misjudge them because we interpret signals emotionally.
Activity starts to feel like progress. Positive language starts to feel like commitment.
But neither of those things actually indicate a decision.
A deal can feel close without being close.
This is where judgment breaks.
Not in what you see. But in how you interpret what you see.
When deals feel close, these patterns show up:
Framework
A simple way to separate signal from noise:
This is not about being pessimistic.
It is about being accurate.
Facts over Feelings
What has objectively changed in the deal? Not tone. Not energy. Actual movement
Decision Signals
Look for evidence like defined timelines, confirmed stakeholders, or explicit next steps tied to a decision
Validation
Test optimism by asking direct questions that may challenge the current narrative
Re-anchoring
Reset your view of the deal based on what is proven, not what is implied
Deals do not close because they feel close.
They close because decisions are made.
And decisions leave evidence.
The question is not how the deal feels.
It is what the deal has proven.
So next time you hear “we’re almost there,” ask:
What evidence do I actually have?
"Deals do not close because they feel close."
Look for concrete decision signals such as confirmed decision-makers, clear timelines, and explicit next steps tied to approval. Without these, progress is likely superficial.
Want to go deeper?
Start a conversation about your team's execution challenges.